Based on the peer reviews I have received from everyone I have worked with I have determined that many people have the same perception of me. This perception matches up with what I expected based on what I have provided in discussion throughout the course of the semester. At the beginning of the semester when we were in subgroups that we didnt know much about I offered a bit of opinions but mainly listened and would generally go with the ideas we came up with. At the end of the semester when I was in a group I had alot of interest in and was knowledgable about the subject I offered many more opinions and we all collaborated our ideas to make our wiki page. I noticed that my feedback matched up with this as well. It was vague and usually had comments like “joked around a bit” and “good contributor”. These comments are vague as opposed to comments I received when I was in a group I had more interest in. I received more complete comments on what my participation was. According to the receivers fact that the receiver is totally in control I would say that is correct. When I received my feedback I already had a set perception of what feedback would be good and what would be bad. I was in control of receiving good feedback from my Sports group because I worked very hard throughout the project. I was in control of receiving minimal feedback from other groups because I did minimal work.
Peer Reviews
Advertisement
